Our Grand Children are victims of;

"Protect the "system" at all costs. The "system" is the only ultimate sacred cow - not any particular law or constitution, but only "the system." Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it - from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen - have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future."

In 1696, England first used the legal principle of parens patriae, which gave the royal crown care of "charities, infants, idiots, and lunatics returned to the chancery." This principal of parens patriae has been identified as the statutory basis for U.S. governmental intervention in families' child rearing practices.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776

Monday, October 31, 2011

Candles In The Window - Family Tradition.

Family Tradition
The Tradition of placing a Candle in the Window goes back to the Colonial times in the United States and back much further in time for other cultures.  It is a Tradition practiced throughout the year. It symbolizes the warmth and security of the Family hearth and signals loyalty to Family members and loved ones  who are not present in the home.


* http://www.americanfamilytraditions.com/Candle_in_the_Window.htm
*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Friday, October 28, 2011

Individual Liberties... Who Am I?

The following is true. At least as far the writers of the evidence know. The unjustness of false allegations, revenge and greed done in the below case is astounding.

Read the below information the way it is first. Mentally fill in the blanks with whatever information your mind wishes to place there. When you are done, come back to the top, hold down the left button of your mouse and highlight everything. This incredible case will be revealed. And shame on you for thinking what you were thinking. We know this could never happen for real... or could it?


The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings before county court trials to prosecute people accused of witchcraft in the counties of Essex, Suffolk, and Middlesex in colonial Massachusetts, between February 1692 and May 1693. Despite being generally known as the Salem witch trials, the preliminary hearings in 1692 were conducted in a variety of towns across the province: Salem Village (now Danvers), Ipswich, Andover and Salem Town.
The best-known trials were conducted by the Court of Oyer and Terminer in 1692 in Salem Town. Over 150 people were arrested and imprisoned, with even more accused but not formally pursued by the authorities. All twenty-six who went to trial before this court were convicted. The four sessions of the Superior Court of Judicature in 1693, held in Salem Village, but also in Ipswich, Boston and Charlestown, produced only three convictions in the thirty-one witchcraft trials it conducted. The two courts convicted twenty-nine people of the capital felony of witchcraft. Nineteen of the accused, fourteen women and five men, were executed by hanging. One man, Giles Corey, refused to enter a plea and was crushed to death under heavy stones in an attempt to force him to do so. At least five more of the accused died in prison.
The episode is one of the most famous cases of mass hysteria, and has been used in political rhetoric and popular literature as a vivid cautionary tale about the dangers of isolationism, religious extremism, false accusations, lapses in due process, and local governmental intrusion on individual liberties.


*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Tell us your story

If you or someone you know has had problems with OCS or CPS, hit comment and tell us your story. Let's compare notes.
If you encounter OCS or CPS, NEVER sign anything. The very first thing we signed was a safety plan. Had we not signed that, they never would have been allowed in our house. If you sign that, you are giving them permission to enter your home. That must stop right now. If they enter and you did not give them permission, they can be charged with civil rights violations under the color of law while acting in an official capacity. They can go to jail. If you tell them to leave your house and not to come back in again and they do, they can go to jail. This info came straight from the FBI.
They have worked this con for so long they are experts at it.
Remember, this a voting country. Your Governor has the right to stop receiving funds that Clinton engaged. No funds, no incentive to steal your kids.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Sunday, October 23, 2011

In Search Of...

We are in search of the right lawyer who is not already in OCS and the states pocket. When we find him or her, we are coming in full force and publicly. We are naming names and punishing all those responsible for the lies, conspiracies, deceit and civil rights offenses against us.
When I was in the Military, I raised my hand to defend the constitution from all threats foreign and domestic. To bad others don't see it that way. My hand is still up. So are my voting rights. OCS has destroyed the childhood of four of my grand children with lies and greed. Our family honor has been desecrated. Now, it is time (LEGALLY) to do something about it.

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Big Brother Takes Children, Again

Reposted from: http://www.pji.org/content/big-brother-takes-children-again

Big Brother Takes Children, Again
Concerned because her baby could not hold down milk, a mother takes her newly born baby to a pediatrician. Because of the pediatrician's inability to diagnose the problem, Child Protection Services is called and takes away the baby...indefinitely.
Absurd? Unthinkable? Well, according to Roberta this story is a horrifying reality.
Just a few days after giving birth to her daughter, Roberta noticed that her baby had difficulty holding down milk. She took her baby to a pediatrician who was unable to diagnose the baby's gastric condition. Instead, the pediatrician reported the mother to Child Protection Services, who took the baby away. (Doctors are required by state law to report all "reasonable suspicions of child abuse or neglect".) Shortly thereafter, her two older boys were taken away as well.
Three months have passed, and Roberta still has yet to be reunited with her children. This is despite the fact that:
--the mother has completed all of her parental counseling classes required by CPS,
--the baby has since been re-examined by another pediatrician who diagnosed the baby's problem as a medical condition (Gastroesophageal Re flux), common to babies,
--the baby continues to have the same digestive problems under the care of the foster parents which had occurred while with the mother, and
--the CPS worker in charge of this case recommends that all three of the children be given back.
So why haven't the children, after three months, been reunited with their loving mother? First, while CPS is very quick to remove children, the present CPS bureaucracy is extremely slow to reunite them, irrespective of the traumatic harm to children resulting from such continued separation from their parent(s). Writing reports to justify their actions is a higher priority to CPS than spending time to reunite families.
Second, the present system of federal reimbursement essentially rewards counties financially the longer children are kept in the foster care system. This observation is the cornerstone of a major class action lawsuit filed last year against Contra Costa County CPS.
Third, CPS workers, with only a few exceptions, are immune from liability from harm caused by their actions dealing with families and children. Hence, CPS has another incentive to take first, and think later.
Fourth, those taxpayer funded "child advocacy" legal groups, often chosen by the judge to represent the children, overstep their roles as legal defenders and instead take on a role as social engineers via their own vision of a "good" parent. For example, in Roberta's case, after her court appointed attorney approached the "child's advocate" with the above facts, the child's attorney arrogantly replied that she simply did not "feel" that the children should be given back...at least yet. "Feel"? Since when does the judicial process justify its continued disruption of the family unit based upon mere feelings, rather than the clearly presented, undisputed facts?
However, probably the most powerful explanation for the continuation of this horrific injustice lies in the intimidating practices of a juvenile system which prevents victimized parents, and children, from exposing these injustices to the public. For example, after Roberta was recently notified that the court would continue to delay in reuniting her with her children, she decided to contact the media in order to expose this travesty, without mentioning her children's names or the court's closed-door proceedings. Nonetheless, just before she was about to be interviewed by a reporter, she was informed by her attorney that she would not get back her children if she told her story to the press. Roberta, like almost all parents in her situation, felt little choice but to cancel the interview.
In other words, the juvenile court system's seemingly unbridled discretion creates a wall of intimidation, a wall preventing the kind of public accountability necessary to expose the need for judicial reform.
Unfortunately, Roberta's case is by no means isolated. We at Pacific Justice Institute continue to receive more and more phone calls from non-abusive parents suffering from very similar injustices. That is why we try to work through a network of CPS specialist attorneys willing to represent parents, just like Roberta, who have suffered from a juvenile legal system and CPS system that are in tremendous need of reform.
Pacific Justice will also continue to be available to give constructive counsel to legislators interested in facilitating such reform. Some states, such as Oklahoma, have already engaged in model reform, which includes the ability for parents to have a jury of their peers before being permanently separated from their children.
If you would like to be informed of similar cases Pacific Justice Institute is handling, please feel free to contact us at (916) 857-6900.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

The Conspiracy has unfolded

It seems the order has been filled and our grand children are now in [that other state]. The next step is to take away all parental rights from the parents. This would be from their own handbook. Next, they will adopt them out. Probably after they take them away from the lottery winner along with his kids. I tried to tell him, but apparently he is not the brightest apple in the basket. They will all see us in Federal court under conspiracy charges and possibly racketeering. We said before that we will never let this go and we never will.

From Mary Ann's notes from today:

10/20/2011 11:40 AM

Called OCS about visitation. Left message on Justin's answering machine voice mail.


Called ******* to ask her if she heard anything about baby [D]. She told me that Jennifer and Archie had another emergency TDM about [L, M. and A.] and that Christy was supposed to have left with the kids @ 9 AM this morning to go to [that other state]. If it's true, we did not even get to say good-bye to them.
Justin called @ 1:15 PM to tell me the kids had already been sent to [that other state]. I asked him why he didn't call back Friday or Monday to at least let us see them one more time. He said that we were supposed to be invited to the emergency TDM meeting they had on Tuesday (not sure what Tuesday). We were never contacted about the TDM meeting. He also said that OCS is trying to have Jennifer and Archies's parental rights taken away and that the kids are being put up for adoption. That everybody... OCS, Jen and Archie all said that we are not acceptable people to raise children.
He also said that it was because of the incident about why they (OCS) took the kids in the first place.

*That was probably the only true thing he has ever said. "The reason why they took the kids in the first place" was to fulfill an order placed from [that other state] and for many to profit from hijacking these kids.

Let's add falsifying records to the list. What is the case file number where the judge said to send the kids out of state? Sending kids out of state is also common practice as it can't be contested in civil court, only in federal court.
Contractual obligations to the other state's foster program with our tax dollars for their profit must also be met, hence the reason to lie, falsify, slander, defame and act under conspiracy and deprivation of rights under the color of law.

OCS are criminals. We have had enough and if the kids don't come back home, right now, we are going to do everything possible to send the Feds out to arrest those responsible for destroying our lives, our children's lives, our home and the youth of our grand children! All four of them.

Monday, October 17, 2011

The God Complex Pecking Order

It appears, contrary to lawyers and others that OCS is in fact... not God. CPS (Child Protective Services) would be their parents. But wait, there's more. The grand parents are the Child Welfare League of America. A 501(c) non profit organization. They are the ones that lobbyed Hillary (I mean Bill) Clinton to pass the Child Welfare Act in 1996. So... a non profit stole our grandkids for profit? These bells ring the same chime as the so called FEDERAL reserve. A group of private bankers that run and rule the nation.
I wonder what I would come up with if I ran through the board of directors for the CWLA, Federal reserve, CPS, OCS, the Democratic Socialists of America and the court system? Would there be a match?

Visit with the kids 10/14

From Mary Ann's notes:

[M] and [A] ate up the apples we brought in like there was no tomorrow. They drank their juice like they hadn't had any for awhile. When [M] and [A] slowed down on eating their apples, that was when [L] ate her apples.
[L's] eyes seemed dilated and she seemed kind of out of it when we first arrived. When they all left, Uncle Bob (foster care) told them to all hold hands. Amy (social worker) said they all grabbed her hand.
None of them seemed to have gained any weight back since they were taken from us. [L] has put up a wall around herself. She is not the same little girl who left us. [M] and [A] seemed a little resigned, but were a little more responsive than the last visit.
The spirit of these children have been smashed and shattered.


[M] was happy with the juice. [L] playing patty cake with gramma.

[L] is sad. She wants to come home.

We got them to horse around.

[A] would not let go of the pictures we gave her.

[M] had a picture. She wanted it back.

Drinking [L's] juice too.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Monday, October 10, 2011

Should We Disappear Or Something Happen To Us.

If something should happen to us or we disappear, be it known that we are of sound mind and body. We are not stupid enough to do wrong. We are only exposing what we believe to be the truth about OCS and Child Protective Services. We now know what they are, what they are doing and how they are doing it. They know we know it. You may want to recall the story of Senator Nancy Shaefer and her husband in their alleged murder suicide.

OCS At It Again... Another Child Theft In Action

As I write this, Office Of Child Safety social workers are attempting to take another grandson from his home. My daughters newest baby has lived with permision from her in a friends home. Now, OCS says that time is up and they are taking him forcefully. This is nothing more than retaliation and another excuse to help raise the bottom line on children in foster care so the dollars will flow into their pockets. The numbers MUST increase each year or the funding stops. Bottom line. Do the research yourself and you will see the increase in children taken since 1997. You may also refer to my last post.

Update 10/23/11

They took the baby that night. There was Bruce and Judy Ringstad from OCS and FIVE police officers. Before they went to her place, OCS harrased her twice at work informing her they wanted the baby. The reason given by OCS was a safety issue, insisting that Donald and Jennifer were living at that address. Another bold and flat out lie by OCS! It was another hijacking for profit.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Tacit Conspiracy/Official Misconduct

From: Wikipedia

Tacit knowledge has been described as “know-how” - as opposed to “know-what” (facts), “know-why” (science), or “know-who” (networking). It involves learning and skill but not in a way that can be written down. The process of transforming tacit knowledge into explicit or specifiable knowledge is known as codification, articulation, or specification. The tacit aspects of knowledge are those that cannot be codified, but can only be transmitted via training or gained through personal experience.


Conspiracy has been defined in the US as an agreement of two or more people to commit a crime, or to accomplish a legal end through illegal actions.[6][7] For example, planning to rob a bank (an illegal act) to raise money for charity (a legal end) remains a criminal conspiracy because the parties agreed to use illegal means to accomplish the end goal. A conspiracy does not need to have been planned in secret to meet the definition of the crime. One legal dictionary, law.com, provides this useful example on the application of conspiracy law to an everyday sales transaction tainted by corruption. It shows how the law can handle both the criminal and the civil need for justice.
[A] scheme by a group of salesmen to sell used automobiles as new, could be prosecuted as a crime of fraud and conspiracy, and also allow a purchaser of an auto to sue for damages [in civil court] for the fraud and conspiracy.
Conspiracy law usually does not require proof of specific intent by the defendants to injure any specific person to establish an illegal agreement. Instead, usually the law only requires the conspirators have agreed to engage in a certain illegal act. This is sometimes described as a "general intent" to violate the law.

A tacit conspiracy is defined as an unspoken "agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but becomes unlawful when done by the combination of [the parties] actors/actions".

Conspiracy against rights

The U.S. has a specific statute dealing with conspiracies to deprive a citizen of rights justified by the Constitution.

Official Misconduct

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Source: The United States Department of Justice

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Suspicions Confirmed

We met with a lawyer (loose term) on 10/6/11. This meeting confirmed what I have researched about the CPS system. I won't mention her name as I do not wish to give her any free advertising. Her actions and words proved to me that she had more than likely already talked to OCS before our meeting and knew all about what was going on before we got there. She was stressed out, nervous and had a tendency to want to yell at us. The stress ball in her hands was a dead giveaway. Her advice to us was to make friends with everyone. We would never win. We took it as shut up and concede. She said we would never get the kids back. She said that OCS and the state were indeed God. Her words. She was actually angry at us for bucking the (her) system.

The meeting with a lawyer was to see if she could help us. As soon as we gave her our $125 and she opened her mouth, I knew she would never be the one. It was obvious she was already in the pockets of OCS and part of the money making system. She is indeed part of the "Good ol' Boys" club.We should have cut the meeting short and left but, since she had no problem taking money from us, I had no problem letting her earn it. I am sure, almost without a doubt, she was on the phone after our departure with OCS.

During our last court visit when the judge asked why we didn't have a lawyer, I told him we could not find one we could trust. Moving children around for profit runs deep.

I have heard through the grapevine that the kids are to be shipped off to la-la land in North Carolina on the 14th of October. Bringing a handsome paycheck of about 50-75 grand a year for the lucky lottery winners. All of this is our opinion, of course.

We intend to put into public documents how it all went down and that we, as their grand parents were NOT responsible for their theft. We are the ONLY one's that don't look at them as dollar signs or an annoyance. Some day, if and when they grow up, they can read all about it, as detailed as possible. They will know who was at fault.Someday, hopefully and short of any more murdered Senators, this ring will be exposed for what it is.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Kids New Bedroom

Other than the three windows we haven't picked up and installed yet, the kid's new bedroom is complete outside. Signed, sealed and delivered.

The inside is insulated and plasticized. We will pick up the sheetrock for it this weekend.

Merle is waiting.

Soon, the chainsaw will install a door right here.

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Thank you for contacting the White House.

Thank You!

Thank you for contacting the White House.
President Obama is committed to creating the most open and accessible Administration in history.  That begins with taking comments and questions from you, the American people, through our website.
Our office receives thousands of messages from Americans each day.  We do our best to reply to as many as we can, but please be aware that you may find more information and answers to your questions online.  To follow news and learn more about President Obama's plans for winning the future, you can sign up for updates from the White House, read the White House Blog, or listen to White House podcasts.
For an easy-to-navigate source of information on Federal government services, please visit: http://www.usa.gov/.
Thank you again for your message.

The Office of Presidential Correspondence