Alaska Fairbanks Office of Children's Services

This is a list of contact information for Alaska Fairbanks Office of Children's Services.

Fairbanks Children's Services
751 Old Richardson Highway, Suite 300
Fairbanks, Alaska 99701

Anchorage: 1-800-478-4444
Southcentral: 1-855-352-8934
Northern Alaska: 1-800-353-2650 (Fairbanks)
Southeast: 1-888-622-1650
Western Region: 1-800-557-3141

christy.lawton@alaska.gov  (State) Director

But, since I can almost guarantee you that any and all correspondence with them will immediately find it's way to the round file (trash can), I would suggest contacting Congressman Don Young instead. EVERYONE who has ever tried to help us has either gone mute or disappeared from our view.

http://donyoung.house.gov/

WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
Office of Congressman Don Young
2314 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
T (202) 225-5765 F (202) 225-0425

I would suggest the President of the United States, but he would't care.


Alaska Govenor Sean Parnell

http://gov.alaska.gov/parnell/contact/email-the-governor.html

Juneau Office

Alaska State Capitol Building
Third Floor

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 110001
Juneau, AK 99811-0001

Telephone Inquiries:
Phone (907) 465-3500
Fax (907) 465-3532

State Info (907) 465-2111







*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

What is domicile under ICWA (Indian Child Welfare Act)

2.4 - What is domicile under ICWA?

Domicile looks to the persons physical presence in a certain place along with the intent to remain in that place. Children typically are unable to form the requisite intent to establish a domicile, so the domicile of the child is determined by that of the parents.

Domicile is important in child custody proceedings because it may affect the jurisdiction of the court. The term is not defined in the ICWA, so the United States Supreme Court found that the meaning of domicile in the ICWA is a matter of federal, not state, law because Congress intended a uniform, nationwide application. Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 44-47 (1989).

A child born in wedlock takes the parents domicile. A child born out of wedlock takes the domicile of his or her mother. Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 43-48.

http://www.narf.org/icwa/faq/jurisdiction.htm

*All four of our grand children were born OUT of wedlock. The mother is not a member of the Eagle Village tribe.
* The legal guardian of three of our grand children (the grand mother) is and was a member of the Noatak tribe.
* From what I read above... the Eagle Village tribe has no jurisdiction in reference to our grand children.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Criteria for recognition as an Indian tribe

As of March 22, 2007, the United States recognized 561 American Indian tribal communities as being eligible for funding and services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) by virtue of their official status as Indian tribes.
Since 1978, tribal communities have been required by law to apply for official acknowledgement as Indian tribes through the BIA. To attain federal acknowledgement as an Indian tribe, a community must apply for recognition through the BIA's Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA), and meet the criteria established by Part 83 of Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations (25 CFR Part 83), Procedures for Establishing that an American Indian Group Exists as an Indian Tribe.
Criteria for recognition as an Indian tribe: Under the above law, a community petitioning the government for recognition as a federally acknowledged Indian tribe must be able to meet all seven of the following criteria:

• Criterion 83.7(a) requires that external observers have identified the petitioner as an American Indian entity on a substantially continuous basis since 1900.
• Criterion 83.7(b) requires that a predominant portion of the petitioning group has comprised a distinct community since historical times.
• Criterion 83.7(c) requires that the petitioning group has maintained political influence over its members as an autonomous entity since historical times.
• Criterion 83.7(d) requires that the petitioner provide a copy of its governing document.
• Criterion 83.7(e) requires that a petitioner's members descend from a historical Indian tribe.
• Criterion 83.7(f) requires that the petitioner's membership be composed principally of persons who are not members of another Federally recognized Indian tribe.
• Criterion 83.7(g) requires that the petitioner not be subject to legislation forbidding the Federal relationship.

Since 1978, 324 groups have stated their intent to apply for tribal acknowledgment through the OFA's administrative process. As of Feb. 15, 2007, 81 of these groups had submitted completed applications. Out of these 81 groups, 16 had been acknowledged as tribes, 24 had been denied tribal designation and the rest remained in various stages of consideration and negotiation.
Federal assistance to recognized Indian tribes includes; development of tribal government, economic development, education, law enforcement, social services, real estate services, agriculture and range management, and resource protection.

* http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsandfreedoms/a/tribalreq.htm

-----------------------------------------------
Eagle Village

Current Population:	67   (2011 Alaska Department of Labor Estimate)
Incorporation Type:	Unincorporated
Borough Located In:	Unorganized
Taxes:	No taxing authority

According to Census 2010, there were 49 housing units in the community and 31 were occupied. Its population was 38.8 percent American Indian or Alaska Native; 55.2 percent white; 1.5 percent black; 1.5 percent Asian; 3 percent of the local residents had multi-racial backgrounds.

* http://www.commerce.state.ak.us/dca/commdb/CIS.cfm?Comm_Boro_Name=Eagle%20Village

* Roughly 26 natives in Eagle Village.

-------------------------------------------------
Noatak

Current Population:	546   (2011 Alaska Department of Labor Estimate)
Incorporation Type:	Unincorporated
Borough Located In:	Northwest Arctic Borough
Taxes:	Sales: None, Property: None, Special: None
National Flood Insurance Program Participant:	Yes
Coastal Management District:	Northwest Arctic Borough

According to Census 2010, there were 114 housing units in the community and 114 were occupied. Its population was 94.8 percent American Indian or Alaska Native; 2.5 percent white; 0.4 percent black; 2.3 percent of the local residents had multi-racial backgrounds.

* http://www.commerce.state.ak.us/dca/commdb/CIS.cfm?Comm_Boro_Name=Noatak

* Roughly 517 natives in Noatak.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

I Can Feel The Ooze...

I can feel the ooze behind the scenes. Ooze of manipulation of people and paperwork in reference to the kidnapping of our grand children by OCS and OTHERS. An ooze filled with lies and back peddling. The cover ups have begun.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Mom Seeks $900 TRILLION For Putting Kids In Foster Care!

Mom Seeks $900 TRILLION For Putting Kids In Foster Care!

Posted: Feb 08, 2012 1:33 PM Updated: Feb 08, 2012 1:33 PM

 A Staten Island mom is making national headlines today after suing the city of West Brighton for $900 trillion, alleging the city improperly placed her two children in foster care.

The $900 trillion figure, first reported by SILive.com, certainly is staggering and the standard response so far has been to treat the lawsuit as something of a joke, focusing on the mother's alleged mental illness.

But I have to agree with the Inquisitr's Kim LaCapria, who says plaintiff Fausat Ogunbayo is actually quite clever in choosing to sue for $900 trillion. After all, how many people would be reading about this story and discussing Ogunbayo's plight had she quietly filed her petition without seeking monetary compensation?

Of course there's no way she'll get a settlement remotely approaching that number, if she is awarded anything at all. After all, the entire U.S. has an annual gross national income of just over $14 trillion. Or, put another way, if Ogunbayo was awarded $900 trillion she'd have enough disposable income to pay off the U.S. national debt several hundred times over.

Ogunbayo sued the city and the Administration for Children's Services (ACS), alleging that both entities violated her and her children's civil liberties by placing them in foster care in June, 2008. In her lawsuit, obtained by The Smoking Gun, Ogunbayo listed her grievances as follows:

"For causing plaintiff substantial economic hardship; for causing plaintiff substantial economic injuries; for depriving plaintiff and plaintiff children's Civil Right, 42 U.S.C. section 1983; for depriving plaintiff and plaintiff's children, the right to family integrity; for depriving plaintiff and plaintiff's children, the right to life, liberty, property and the right guaranteed by statute; for disregarding the probability of plaintiff's children, suffering emotional and mental distress."

The city has not responded to Ogunbayo's lawsuit but contends that she is mentally ill and unable to properly care for her two boys, who are now teenagers.The New York City Law Department released a statement to ABC News, which said, "We are unable to comment on pending litigation.  The amount a plaintiff requests in a lawsuit has no bearing on whether the case has any merit and no relation to actual damages if any."

The state alleges Ogunbayo suffers from hallucinations, refuses mental health treatment and placed her children at risk by leaving them at home for several hours each day. Two of the more specific allegations are that Ogunbayo wrote to her children's former school, insisting that the FBI and Secret Service were after her children and that their skin was becoming darker due to radiation exposure.

However, the state Appellate Division recently threw out a family court finding that Ogunbayo was guilty of neglecting her children. "Proof of mental illness alone will not support a finding of neglect," the court ruled, according to SILive.com

Ogunbayo is representing herself in the case

FIND MORE ON THIS TOPIC WITH BING

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Ultimate Dog Tease (funny video)

This is one of the funniest videos I have ever seen. Placed here for entertainment and traffic generation.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Here it comes. TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) by force.

*Update 2/12/2012

The court rescheduled the hearing for termination of parental rights for June 14th. Roughly 18 months after OCS got their hands on the kids. Right on schedule.

------------------------------------------

Here it comes. TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) by force. When they can't get the parents to give up their parental rights, they wait. After a certain amount of time passes, they do it anyway. To make the time pass, they (OCS,CPS) have little court hearings and delays for one reason or another. More arrogance, intimidation, lies and false allegations as well. It is 18 months, so time is almost up. Time for another office party filled will praise and bonuses. A kidnapping well done.
Are the lucky recipients in an Alaskan village of complete strangers? Or are they the original child ordering recipients for these children 3000 miles from Alaska?

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207