The Mafia and OCS.

"The Mafia (also known as Cosa Nostra) is a criminal syndicate that emerged in the mid-nineteenth century in Sicily, Italy. It is a loose association of criminal groups that share a common organizational structure and code of conduct, and whose common enterprise is protection racketeering. Each group, known as a "family", "clan", or "cosca", claims sovereignty over a territory in which it operates its rackets – usually a town or village or a neighbourhood (borgata) of a larger city. Its members call themselves "men of honor", although the public often refers to them as "mafiosi"."
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Sicilian_Mafia

I must apologise for the comparison of the Mafia and Child Protection Services (get it... protection?). I would like to apologise to the Mafia, as from what I have always read and heard, the group has honor, and they care for their kids. Child Protection Services, or Office of Children's Services (OCS) from where I am, has none. They lie, they cheat, they misinform, they manipulate, they hypnotize people into seeing things that are not there and they throw out false allegations. All under the cover of secrecy and "the color of law". All they need do is make a statement and the world, and the courts, think it must be true. After all... the right hand of God said so. It is indeed, a "Good ol' Boys Club".
Like the AAG in this case, who was a member of the gang who helped steel the grandmothers inheritance in the late 90's. A 160 acre homestead and two other properties. The mother was placed in an eight thousand dollar per month state owned Pioneers Home assisted living quarters. It didn't take long to suck up that money. She knows us and we know her. Then a lawyer, is now an Assistant Attorney General. an uncanny coincidence. This a severe conflict of interest with her on the simulated board of child accusations.

A case in point...

As anyone has read, OCS has kidnapped for profit, three of our grand children and shipped them off to another state. They used lies and false allegations with extreme prejudice to accomplish this monetarily profitable endeavor. I must say again, under the color of law and governmental immunity. They have also stolen the fourth grand child (of a different father) the same way.

Here is the excuse used for this kidnapping (from their own paper work):

I quote:

"There is further concern about neglect by Ms. XXXX as not only does she know that Mr. XXXXXXXX may have sexually abused her child but she continues to allow her own father to have access and unsupervised contact with her children. Ms. XXXX has stated many times that she has blocked out her childhood because of abuse she suffered by her father. Ms. XXXX has stated to previous OCS workers (*not named) that her father sexually abused her when she was a child. Ms. XXXX's oldest child, L.R. went through a paternity test recently to rule out Ms. XXXX's own father, Clipper XXXXXXX, as the biological father of L.R.. Mr.XXXX, Ms. XXXX's current husband, had also worried that Clipper may be the father of his own grandchild. Ms. XXXX has demonstrated time and again that she cannot see danger for her children and does not plan effectively to keep them safe."

Unquote

I can garenXXXXXXteeya OCS has stolen these kids under false pretenses and false allegations. I would also like to apologies in advance for what I am about to say. It takes a sorry son-of-a-xxxxx to say something like that. I take a REAL offense towards this. I have tolerated it for fear of loosing my grandchildren. I am done with toleration. These "public" officials need to become public. Like Justin. When all others fail to intimidate, send him in to take away the rights of others. We have a professional who says L.R. is (was) just fine. Her opinion didn't matter as she was not a member of the paid service providers used by OCS. We also have school records that say the kids were happy and doing fine. We also have the forensic tests from the Alaska State Troopers that say nothing happened. To use the same crap to steal another kid is even worse. A Grandson I have never yet met.
I would assume, from what I have heard, that the next step in OCS's threats and intimidation would be that if the father of the first three kids does not sign over his parental rights (which he has not and we are proud of him for that) they will threaten him with taking his kids back from (the other state) they are in and placing them in some foster home in an Alaskan (Eagle) native village with COMPLETE strangers. All in the guise of culture.
The grandmother is from Kotzebue and is an Alaskan native.  Who's leg would they be pulling here? If those kids were sent to a village, it would be about retaliation and money.
Which leads me back to the Mafia (although perverted). How far has this gone?


Quo warranto (Medieval Latin for "by what warrant?") is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or "franchise") they claim to hold.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Quo_warranto
*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Child Protective Services and Organized Crime Management in Government

This information was borrowed from

Abused Swan

http://www.abusedswan.com/child_protective_services

The Terrible Truth About

Child Protective Services and

Organized Crime Management

in Government
by James Roger Brown

"Beginning about 1973, criminal elements in the mental health and social work professions began cooperating to construct an organized criminal enterprise that exploits children behind the legislated secrecy of the child protection, juvenile justice, and mental health systems."
    
The contemporary end result is a nationwide organized criminal operation that uses everything from sophisticated science-fraud-based "evaluation" instruments structured to produce false positives to third party state service contracts written to sustain a system of structural corruption in which state employees and contract service providers must falsify records and testimony or they will not continue to be employed or paid.

To maintain their existence, organized criminal operations must construct management bureaucracies with policies and procedures necessary to sustain daily operations, just like any other bureaucracy. The only adaptation required to run criminal operations in the government and quasi-government agencies which constitute the child protection system is that they must be integrated into the policies and procedures of the umbrella agency and not be detected as components of a criminal bureaucracy.

The existence of organized crime in the child protection system of any given state is not that difficult to detect. Prominent among the indicators are:

 (1) the annual number of founded child abuse allegations can be predicted from the number of conditional federal grant and reimbursement salary fund dollars needed to balance the state child protection agency payroll (the number of children taken into state custody each year will be the number sufficient to generate the federal fund claims necessary to balance the agency payroll); and

(2) third party contracts to file state child protection agency federal fund claims will contain provisions that only compensate the contractor for increases in federal funds paid to the state over and above the amount paid in the previous contract for such claim filing services. The latter creates a system that will only result in compensation to the contractor if the number of children taken into state custody constantly increases and/or the total claims generated from each child in state custody increases each contract cycle. The net result is a system in which everyone stays employed only if the number of founded child abuse cases and children taken into state custody always increases and never decreases. An important byproduct of this criminal process of exploiting children independent of the true child abuse rate is the blind political support for the criminal operations generated by the constant flow of conditional federal funds into the respective State's economy.

There are similar lessons to be drawn from the embarrassment of the Bush Administration over numerous ignored warnings that Osama bin Laden planned to hijack planes and fly them into buildings and the embarrassment of Florida Officials having to explain fifteen months of falsified child protection records, sworn court testimony that Rilya Wilson was in Florida State custody and doing fine, and falsified federal fund claims for services delivered to a child that may have been dead the entire time.

After the collapse of the World Trade Center, both the American Public and terrorists worldwide now know the United States is vulnerable to attack, due in large part to corruption, incompetence and mismanagement in intelligence and law enforcement agencies. After the Rilya Wilson case in Florida, the Public and every child molester, pornographer and other criminal who need children for their misdeeds know that the corruption, incompetence and mismanagement in the child protection system can be exploited as cover to acquire children for their own illicit purposes.

What happened to Rilya Wilson in Florida can happen in any state where the current organized criminal exploitation of children is allowed to continue. Sooner or later other criminals, including child molesters and child pornographers, are going to become sufficiently aware of the mechanisms the current organized criminals are using to manage their criminal bureaucracy that they will also be able to exploit the system, as were the people who reportedly kidnapped Rilya Wilson and returned a week later to collect her clothes. Among the obvious possibilities is obtaining information about the criminal activity (falsifying federal claims, official reports, insurance claims, etc.) of individual state employees or licensed professionals, like psychiatrists and psychologist, and blackmailing them to allow access to children for criminal exploitation or perversion.

Austin, Texas DHS Supervisor committed suicide after allegedly being caught running a foster child prostitution ring from his office computer. In a recent Arkansas Legislative Session, a bill drafted by Arkansas Department of Human Services employees was discovered to contain provisions that would have required employees to lie about records and facts, even if subpoenaed. The bill was withdrawn once the Legislator duped into being the primary sponsor was made aware of its contents. In a June 6, 2002, opinion, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that an infant Arkansas citizen had been illegally transferred to Florida State custody in what was essentially an interstate criminal conspiracy to seize and transport children in complete disregard of State and Federal law. (See Arkansas Department of Human Services v Cox, Supreme Court of Arkansas No. 01-1021, 349ark, issue 3, sc 9, 6 June 2002 http://courts.state.ar.us/opinions/2002a/20020606/01-1021.wpd)

The important point being that these child protection system criminals will be pushing the envelop on what they can get away with, as in these examples, and sometimes that envelop will rupture, as in the Rilya Wilson case, exposing not only the criminals but government officials and private citizens who were indirectly benefiting from the criminal activity. The important question being how sophisticated, brutal and embarrassing will organized crime in the child protection system be allowed to become before it is addressed. The recent horror story of a fifteen-month delay in Florida officials discovering that foster child Rilya Wilson had apparently been kidnapped by persons knowledgeable of the inner workings of the child protection system was due to the systematic falsification of child protection system records. This falsification of child protection system records is part of a national pattern of organized crime. It is not an isolated incident. In the Rilya Wilson case, even the Foster Mother continued to receive and accept payments for the care of Rilya over a year after the child disappeared. Caseworkers reportedly told her to take the money.

If I may be of further assistance, please contact me at:

James Roger Brown
Director
THE SOCIOLOGY CENTER
P.O. Box 2075

Little Rock, AR 72115
(501) 374-1788
thesociologist@aol.com

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86IHL8L9tIo