Our Grand Children are victims of;

"Protect the "system" at all costs. The "system" is the only ultimate sacred cow - not any particular law or constitution, but only "the system." Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it - from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen - have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future."

In 1696, England first used the legal principle of parens patriae, which gave the royal crown care of "charities, infants, idiots, and lunatics returned to the chancery." This principal of parens patriae has been identified as the statutory basis for U.S. governmental intervention in families' child rearing practices.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
— Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
— Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776


Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2012

The Proposed Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

 
SECTION 1

The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is a fundamental right. 

 SECTION 2

Neither the United States nor any state shall infringe this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.

SECTION 3

This article shall not be construed to apply to a parental action or decision that would end life.
  
SECTION 4

No treaty may be adopted nor shall any source of international law be employed to supersede, modify, interpret, or apply to the rights guaranteed by this article.


Senate Sponsors
Below is a list of Senate cosponsors of SJRes42, the Parental Rights Amendment in the 112th Congress (2011-12).
If either of your Senators is on the list below, you may want to write a letter of thanks to him or her for supporting the Amendment in the Senate.
(For a list of Senate cosponsors in the 111th Congress (2009-10), click here.)
Find your Senators' contact information by clicking on your state on our States Watch page.

The following members of the U.S. Senate have sponsored the Parental Rights Amendment in the 112th Congress (2011-12): [As of this date]
Sen. Jim DeMint (SC), lead sponsor.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC)
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (GA)
Sen. Mike Enzi (WY)
Sen. John Barasso (WY)
Sen. Charles Grassley (IA)
Sen. Roy Blunt (MO)
Sen. Johnny Isakson (GA)
Sen. James Risch (ID)
Sen. Mike Lee (UT)
Sen. Marco Rubio (FL)
Sen. John Boozman (AR)
Sen. Jerry Moran (KS)
Congressional Sponsors
Below is a list of Congressional cosponsors of HJRes110, the Parental Rights Amendment, in the 2011-12 Congress.
(To see a list of Congressional cosponsors of the Parental Rights Amendment in the 2009-10 Congress, click here.)
If your current Representative is on this list, you may want to email them and thank them for cosponsoring the Parental Rights Amendment.
Find your Congressman's contact information, or check for cosponsors by state, by clicking on your state from our States Watch page or the sidebar at right.
The following members of the 112th U.S. House of Representatives have sponsored the Parental Rights Amendment:
Rep. Trent Franks (AZ-2), lead sponsor. 
Rep. Todd Akin (MO-2) Rep. Rodney Alexander (LA-5) Rep. Spencer Bachus (AL-6)
Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (MD-6) Rep. Dan Benishek (MI-1) Rep. Rob Bishop (UT-1)
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (TN-7) Rep. Jo Bonner (AL-1) Rep. Mo Brooks (AL-5)
Rep. Paul Broun (GA-10) Rep. Vern Buchanan (FL-13) Rep. Dan Burton (IN-5)
Rep. Dave Camp (MI-4) Rep. Francisco Canseco (TX-23) Rep. Bill Cassidy (LA-6)
Rep. Mike Coffman (CO-6) Rep. Chip Cravaack (MN-8) Rep. Geoff Davis (KY-4)
Rep. Jeff Duncan (SC-3) Rep. Stephen Fincher (TN-8) Rep. John Fleming (LA-4)
Rep. Randy Forbes (VA-4) Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (NE-1) Rep. Trent Franks (AZ-2)
Rep. Elton Gallegley (CA-24) Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA-11) Rep. Robert Goodlatte (VA-6)
Rep. Paul Gosar (AZ-1) Rep. Gregg Harper (MS-3) Rep. Andy Harris (MD-1)
Rep. Vicky Hartzler (MO-4) Rep. Bill Huizinga (MI-2) Rep. Randy Hultgren (IL-14)
Rep. Duncan Hunter (CA-52) Rep. Bill Johnson (OH-6) Rep. Tim Johnson (IL-15)
Rep. Walter Jones (NC-3) Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-4) Rep. Mike Kelly (PA-3)
Rep. Steve King (IA-5) Rep. John Kline (MN-2) Rep. Doug Lamborn (CO-5)
Rep. Jeff Landry (LA-3) Rep. Tom Latham (IA-4) Rep. Robert Latta (OH-5)
Rep. Cynthia Lummis (WY) Rep. Donald Manzullo (IL-16) Rep. Kenny Marchant (TX-24)
Rep. Tom McClintock (CA-4) Rep. Thad McCotter (MI-11) Rep. Candice Miller (MI-10)
Rep. Jeff Miller (FL-1) Rep. Tim Murphy (PA-18) Rep. Sue Myrick (NC-9)
Rep. Randy Neugebauer (TX-19) Rep. Rich Nugent (FL-5) Rep. Alan Nunnelee (MS-1)
Rep. Pete Olson (TX-22) Rep. Steven Palazzo (MS-4) Rep. Joe Pitts (PA-16)
Rep. Todd Platts (PA-19) Rep. Denny Rehberg (MT) Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA-5)
Rep. Mike D. Rogers (AL-3) Rep. Todd Rokita (IN-5) Rep. Peter Roskam (IL-6)
Rep. Dennis Ross (FL-12) Rep. Ed Royce (CA-40) Rep. David Schwiekert (AZ-5)
Rep. Pete Sessions (TX-32) Rep. Chris Smith (NJ-4) Rep. Pat Tiberi (OH-12)
Rep. Fred Upton (MI-6) Rep. Tim Walberg (MI-7) Rep. Joe Walsh (IL-8)
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (GA-3) Rep. Joe Wilson (SC-2) Rep. Rob Wittman (VA-1)
Rep. Frank Wolf (VA-10) Rep. Don Young (AK)

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

U.N. treaty threatens U.S. homeschoolers

As re-posted from :  WND Education

DeMint: U.N. treaty threatens U.S. homeschoolers

Republican defends against liberals intent on imposing backdoor globalism

In the past few weeks, two proposed United Nations treaties failed to advance. The small-arms treaty failed at the U.N. while opponents of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) amassed enough votes to block it in the U.S. Senate.
Now, Sen. Jim DeMint,R-S.C., says another U.N. treaty that threatens American sovereignty has been put back on the table by foreign diplomats and their internationalist allies in the federal government. It’s called the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Disabled, which calls for government agents to supersede the authority of parents of disabled children and even covers abortion.
Proponents, including many Republicans, claim it will help to expand rights and opportunities for disabled people in all nations, but DeMint isn’t buying it.
“When you look at the language in the treaty you realize there are other things at stake here. A lot of language in there that has nothing to do with disabilities and that is likely to push the U.S. toward more international law,” DeMint told WND.
DeMint says the language of the treaty suggests it will promote abortion and chip away at parental rights — particularly the rights of homeschooling parents.
“Homeschoolers are up in arms. We already have some judges in our country that are using international law to change our laws.
“We’re afraid that if the language suggests that parental authority is not absolute, we’re going to have an international body telling our parents they can’t homeschool.”
The senator says the U.S. is by far the most accommodating nation in the world for people with disabilities and he sees no need to sign this or most other U.N.treaties because it can only erode American sovereignty.
“We’re well entangled at this point, we don’t need another treaty.”
DeMint explains what he thinks supporters of the treaty are missing and how he thinks a Senate vote on the treaty would go if it were held today.
“America needs to be the model of the world. We need to be the light rather than trying to submit ourselves to other nations.”


*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)