Our Grand Children are victims of;

"Protect the "system" at all costs. The "system" is the only ultimate sacred cow - not any particular law or constitution, but only "the system." Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it - from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen - have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future."

In 1696, England first used the legal principle of parens patriae, which gave the royal crown care of "charities, infants, idiots, and lunatics returned to the chancery." This principal of parens patriae has been identified as the statutory basis for U.S. governmental intervention in families' child rearing practices.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776

Monday, January 23, 2012

The Grace Commision, H. R. 2883 and the Social Security Trust Fund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (PSSCC), commonly referred to as The Grace Commission, was an investigation requested by United States President Ronald Reagan, in 1982. The focus of it was waste and inefficiency in the US Federal government. Its head, businessman J. Peter Grace,[1] asked the members of that commission to "be bold" and "work like tireless bloodhounds. Don't leave any stone unturned in your search to root out inefficiency."[2]

"The report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the federal government, and another one-third escapes collection owing to the underground economy. “With two thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt and by federal government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services [that] taxpayers expect from their government."[4]

1.^ Gilpin, Kenneth N. (April 21, 1995). "J. Peter Grace, Ex-Company Chief, Dies at 81". The New York Times.
2.^ http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1982/31082d.htm Ronald Reagan, "Remarks at a White House Luncheon With the Chairman and Executive Committee of the Private Sector Survey on Cost Control" (March 10, 1982)


Social Security Trust Fund

"...two years after the Social Security fund was started (back in the 1930s) Congress noticed there was a lot of money available and started spending it. But, that's another story.
Anyway, today there are zero dollars in the Social Security trust fund. Instead, Congress "lent" the money to the general fund and spent it on programs that were never authorized to the federal government by the Constitution. The Social Security trust fund, therefore, contains nothing more than IOUs. And, the only way that $4-trillion will ever be replaced is by tax increases.
This, of course, is legally called gross misappropriation of funds and would get the leaders of Anybusiness USA some significant prison time if they did such a thing with retirement funds..."


H. R. 2883 - The Funding Of The S.S. Follow The Money

One Hundred Twelfth Congress
of the
United States of America

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

An Act

"To amend part B of title IV of the Social Security Act to extend the child and
family services program through fiscal year 2016, and for other purposes."


This would mean that OCS (CPS) is funded by the Social Security Trust Fund and Federal taxes. No secret here. They get part of your taxes and your retirement account. A double dip.
President Reagan requested The Grace Commission to investigate waste and inefficiency in the US Federal government.

A similar commission should be requested to investigate the waste, inefficiency, fraud, perjury, kidnapping and misconduct in the Child Protective Services racket.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Sunday, January 22, 2012

School paperwork failure costs mom custody of son

Moved into social services agency over 'unexcused' absences

The fact that a New York school district simply delayed processing the paperwork for a mother who decided to homeschool her son cost the mother custody – at least temporarily – of her son, according to a new report.
The Home School Legal Defense Association reports that what should have been no more than a simple misunderstanding or paperwork mixup resulted in the child being taken into custody by social services agencies.
The organization which works worldwide to promote the rights of parents and students and to advocate for homeschooling said it was using pseudonyms, Sherry and Carson Fleming, to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.
The report posted online said the conflict developed in the Albany school district and escalated unchecked until the New York Department of Children, Youth, and Families removed the child, Carson, from the family home.
“One of the problems that homeschoolers face in New York is that school districts are very quick to involve DCYF when there is even a minor dispute over paperwork,” said Darren Jones, a litigation attorney for the HSLDA who worked on the case.
The case developed after Fleming submitted to the district her notice of intent and began homeschooling Carson at the start of the 2011-2012 year. As it’s normal for school districts to allow weeks to pass before they process such paperwork, it’s not unusual for schools to total up weeks’ worth of unexcused absences, the HSLDA said.
“While Ms. Fleming waited for the school to review her information, the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) received an anonymous accusation, presumably from a schoolteacher, that Carson had unexcused absences from school. Blaming Ms. Fleming for refusing to cooperate with school officials, DCYF charged her with educational neglect. At her hearing, the judge, unfamiliar with New York’s homeschooling laws, refused to recognize that Ms. Fleming was in compliance with the law and ordered that Carson attend public school. But after Ms. Fleming visited the school officials the next day, they approved her homeschool and informed the court,” the organization reported.
simply refused and ordered that because Carson was not enrolled in the public However, the trials were just beginning, because while Fleming believed the neglect charges would be dropped with the approval of her actions, the judge school he must be removed from his mother and put into a foster home.
The HSLDA said it was able to sort out the information and obtain from the DCYF a dismissal of the charges, allowing Carson to return home.
It was just days ago when WND reported that position was exactly what a politician has begun advocating.
The issue arose after Lotta Edholm, a prominent leader of Sweden’s liberal party, opined in an article in Aftonbladet, a Swedish newspaper, that the nation’s social service laws should be changed to encourage social workers to take children away from homeschooling families.
“That the deputy minister of social affairs, Maria Larsson … should take an initiative to change the social services act so that the social authorities can intervene when children are kept away from school by their parents,” she wrote on her blog.
“A country that does not permit home education is not really a free country,” noted Michael Donnelly, director of international affairs for the HSLDA.
Donnelly, who has worked closely in support of homeschooling families in a number of nations where they are being persecuted, said the change in Sweden is a turn for the worse.


*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Repost from: Thursday, October 20, 2011

"From Mary Ann's notes from today:

10/20/2011 11:40 AM

Called OCS about visitation. Left message on Justin's answering machine voice mail.


Called ******* to ask her if she heard anything about baby ******. She told me that Jennifer and Archie had another emergency TDM about *******, ****** and ***** and that Christy was supposed to have left with the kids @ 9 AM this morning to go to North Carolina. If it's true, we did not even get to say good-bye to them.
Justin called @ 1:15 PM to tell me the kids had already been sent to North Carolina. I asked him why he didn't call back Friday or Monday to at least let us see them one more time. He said that we were supposed to be invited to the emergency TDM meeting they had on Tuesday (not sure what Tuesday). We were never contacted about the TDM meeting. He also said that OCS is trying to have Jennifer and Archies's parental rights taken away and that the kids are being put up for adoption. That everybody... OCS, Jen and Archie all said that we are not acceptable people to raise children.
He also said that it was because of the incident about why they (OCS) took the kids in the first place."

From then until now, not one shred of evidence or proof has been given us that the kids are indeed in North Carolina. We know Justin, and the other minions at OCS are liars. It would not surprise us that they lied and the kids are still in Alaska.

It is amazing that a group of social misfits such as OCS think that "If we just shut up and stay silent, this case will go away and through patience, their paychecks are protected.

The answer is no, no, no. This dinosaur train is moving forward. Secrecy is the key to their happiness. Our next steps are billboards and car top carriers naming names and telling of this theft. We figure if they wish to make false allegations, then the world should know about it. Our hope is that people, city and state wide, will reel their children in and protect them from the hypocrisy of The Office of Children's Services. At least in Fairbanks, Alaska. Maybe next year, they will be cleaning toilets instead of kidnapping kids.This message has gone independently worldwide. Should we disappear, guess who they will look at.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Once upon a sad recent time...

"Once upon a sad recent time... in a far away cold land in America, there was a family. This was a normal family. They had the same challenges that most families do during this time of young marriages and child rearing.

This was a time when government agencies and others knew best how to raise children and how to care for the old more than the families they lived with. They had false themes masked in law and secrecy. Imposed upon families like Gods of fear. They gave the impression of knowing best what was right. Guised impressions indeed of their true agenda of profit and personal gain for themselves. This was a loveless and careless lot of profiteers preying on the the youth and the helpless old for satisfaction of screwing a job well done. Traumatizing of others meant nothing compared to the wealth gained. Families be damned. Filling of money coffers was the true goal."

More story to follow...


*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Monday, January 16, 2012

The Mafia and OCS.

"The Mafia (also known as Cosa Nostra) is a criminal syndicate that emerged in the mid-nineteenth century in Sicily, Italy. It is a loose association of criminal groups that share a common organizational structure and code of conduct, and whose common enterprise is protection racketeering. Each group, known as a "family", "clan", or "cosca", claims sovereignty over a territory in which it operates its rackets – usually a town or village or a neighbourhood (borgata) of a larger city. Its members call themselves "men of honor", although the public often refers to them as "mafiosi"."

I must apologise for the comparison of the Mafia and Child Protection Services (get it... protection?). I would like to apologise to the Mafia, as from what I have always read and heard, the group has honor, and they care for their kids. Child Protection Services, or Office of Children's Services (OCS) from where I am, has none. They lie, they cheat, they misinform, they manipulate, they hypnotize people into seeing things that are not there and they throw out false allegations. All under the cover of secrecy and "the color of law". All they need do is make a statement and the world, and the courts, think it must be true. After all... the right hand of God said so. It is indeed, a "Good ol' Boys Club".
Like the AAG in this case, who was a member of the gang who helped steel the grandmothers inheritance in the late 90's. A 160 acre homestead and two other properties. The mother was placed in an eight thousand dollar per month state owned Pioneers Home assisted living quarters. It didn't take long to suck up that money. She knows us and we know her. Then a lawyer, is now an Assistant Attorney General. an uncanny coincidence. This a severe conflict of interest with her on the simulated board of child accusations.

A case in point...

As anyone has read, OCS has kidnapped for profit, three of our grand children and shipped them off to another state. They used lies and false allegations with extreme prejudice to accomplish this monetarily profitable endeavor. I must say again, under the color of law and governmental immunity. They have also stolen the fourth grand child (of a different father) the same way.

Here is the excuse used for this kidnapping (from their own paper work):

I quote:

"There is further concern about neglect by Ms. XXXX as not only does she know that Mr. XXXXXXXX may have sexually abused her child but she continues to allow her own father to have access and unsupervised contact with her children. Ms. XXXX has stated many times that she has blocked out her childhood because of abuse she suffered by her father. Ms. XXXX has stated to previous OCS workers (*not named) that her father sexually abused her when she was a child. Ms. XXXX's oldest child, L.R. went through a paternity test recently to rule out Ms. XXXX's own father, Clipper XXXXXXX, as the biological father of L.R.. Mr.XXXX, Ms. XXXX's current husband, had also worried that Clipper may be the father of his own grandchild. Ms. XXXX has demonstrated time and again that she cannot see danger for her children and does not plan effectively to keep them safe."


I can garenXXXXXXteeya OCS has stolen these kids under false pretenses and false allegations. I would also like to apologies in advance for what I am about to say. It takes a sorry son-of-a-xxxxx to say something like that. I take a REAL offense towards this. I have tolerated it for fear of loosing my grandchildren. I am done with toleration. These "public" officials need to become public. Like Justin. When all others fail to intimidate, send him in to take away the rights of others. We have a professional who says L.R. is (was) just fine. Her opinion didn't matter as she was not a member of the paid service providers used by OCS. We also have school records that say the kids were happy and doing fine. We also have the forensic tests from the Alaska State Troopers that say nothing happened. To use the same crap to steal another kid is even worse. A Grandson I have never yet met.
I would assume, from what I have heard, that the next step in OCS's threats and intimidation would be that if the father of the first three kids does not sign over his parental rights (which he has not and we are proud of him for that) they will threaten him with taking his kids back from (the other state) they are in and placing them in some foster home in an Alaskan (Eagle) native village with COMPLETE strangers. All in the guise of culture.
The grandmother is from Kotzebue and is an Alaskan native.  Who's leg would they be pulling here? If those kids were sent to a village, it would be about retaliation and money.
Which leads me back to the Mafia (although perverted). How far has this gone?

Quo warranto (Medieval Latin for "by what warrant?") is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or "franchise") they claim to hold.
*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Friday, January 13, 2012

Rule of Law or Law of Rulers? Video

Every family needs to watch this as well as read the Bill of Rights. One of the biggest problems is that a huge group has no understanding and appreciation for our rights. Ignorance is the first step towards your rights being revoked!

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Here is an exerpt of what's coming. If my regular puplisher won't accept it, Kindle will.

Here is an exerpt of what's coming. If my regular puplisher (Publish america) won't accept it, Kindle will.
"The GKs (grand kids) second home would have been an envy to any native village. For their ages, these GKs knew more about how to make it in this semi-remote area than most would in this society. Welfare, free snow machines and free boats were not in their vocabulary. They trusted their elders as all little ones should. Anyone who thinks other wise has one eye missing... the third one. Those that misuse that trust should return their minds to their three years old selves. Those that can't or won't, have alternative purposes and care nothing of elder trust. They care only for personal gain. Children to them would be nothing more than dollar signs. They have cold hearts and only two eyes. In this case, even the term "Native American" would be a joke. Values lost in the greed and screwed up monopoly of modern day America. The great American melting pot has poured children into gold coins. Funneled into the coffers of the greedy, arrogant and non-caring."

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Permanency Hearing Date 01/05/2012

Here is the Permanency Hearing Date for the kids. When the last hearing was held in December, Office of Children's Services told us it would be on one date... it was held the day before. The same M.O. seems to be happening here. We were told it would be on the 6th but it will be held on the 5th with no notice. Ex Parte? It seems very popular. Watch for it if you have a case. Keep an eye on the below address (for Alaska, Fairbanks). Check it every day. It is public information.


*Adoption by Relatives:

...In 12 States, the child must have resided with the relative for a period of time or have established a
significant relationship with the relative in some other way. (14)

(14) Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, Missouri, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Virginia.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

American Constitutional Rights

American Constitutional Rights 
When child abuse investigations are conducted by people whose main goal is to dig up dirt on a family to assassinate their character and desire for every family to be in "therapy," you end up with a mess- this mess we have right now of incompetence and corruption.- Leonard Henderson Oregon Family Rights

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This means you CANNOT disparage a parent's choice of religion and use that in your creation of an abuse/neglect case.
It further means you CANNOT "gag order" a parent from seeking other parents, counselors, or advocates to network with
Nor can you demand parents to remove advertisements from newspapers, or posters, brochures or letters, or meet to strategize defenses or bring public attention to their cases.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
This means you CANNOT barge into somebody's home without a SEARCH WARRANT which must ALREADY BE signed by a judge on PROBABLE CAUSE and somebody's OATH that there is a REALLY GOOD reason to invade this family.
This means that an anonymous "Hot Line" call is NOT "Probable Cause"
This means that you have to SPECIFY exactly what you are looking for.
This means that you CANNOT just go into somebody's house on a "fishing expedition" for the purpose of LOOKING for ANYTHING to use to create a case against the family.
This also means that CHILDREN have the same rights against YOU as their parents and are entitled to the same Constitutional protections AGAINST you searching and seizing THEIR PERSONS without "Probable Cause".
From the FBI Color of Law Civil Rights Violations page- An official would violate the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated. In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate the color of law statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the property (kidnapping the child) of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or misapplied his authority.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This means you had better give people their Miranda Rights before you ask a single question.
This means that you had better not THREATEN people to talk with you.  You have no business threatening to TAKE THE KIDS if people refuse to SURRENDER their Constitutional Right NOT to talk with you.
This also means you had better NOT snatch the kids unless they really have been deliberately PHYSICALLY injured.
This means that KIDNAPPING THE CHILDREN from their parents and holding them hostage with their release CONTINGENT upon the parents "jumping through the hoops" of  compelled "Parenting Classes",  "counseling" with contractor  "mental health clinicians"  is DEPRIVING both the children and their parents of their lives, liberty, and property without "due process of law"
You cannot PRETEND that KIDNAPPING a child from their own home is "in their best interest".  If a REAL CRIME has been committed, the perpetrator should be the one removed.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
This means that you had better tell people what the allegation is and inform them of their Miranda Rights  and has Counsel present before you ask a single question.
This means that the "Anonymous Tip" probably came from somebody USING YOU to destroy a person for reasons that have NOTHING to do with any child abuse.  If the "tipster" doesn't have enough guts to make a REAL accusation in person, nothing they say is credible.  The accused should NOT have to guess who made the accusation and what the "tipster's" true motive is.
This means that you CANNOT HIDE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE in order to KNOWINGLY prosecute an innocent person.
This means that contrary to how it has been operating, the BURDEN OF PROOF is NOT on the accused to "prove a negative"- that NOTHING HAPPENED.  And the "rubber stamp say-so" of the subjective OPINION of a mental health clinician is NOT EVIDENCE.
This means that "second hand hear-say" information is NOT evidence.

Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
This means that YOU are NOT the Prosecution, Judge, Jury, and Executioner.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
This means that YOU are NOT the Prosecution, Judge, Jury, and Executioner.
From the FBI Color of Law Civil Rights Violations page-The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
What do you think the compelled parenting classes, psych evals and continuous meetings that conflict with jobs are- if they ARE NOT punishment and a summary judgment?  And by the time YOU are done "piling charges" and Assassinating parent's characters, they can never get a job again.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Which means that THE PEOPLE HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS.  CPS workers have NONE

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Amendment XIV
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
From the FBI Color of Law Civil Rights Violations page-The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.


*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207