Our Grand Children are victims of;

"Protect the "system" at all costs. The "system" is the only ultimate sacred cow - not any particular law or constitution, but only "the system." Because, ultimately, it is the system which makes certain that the individuals functioning within it - from judges to lawyers, to prosecutors, to politicians, to businessmen - have their places and positions, and opportunities and pecking order, and future."

In 1696, England first used the legal principle of parens patriae, which gave the royal crown care of "charities, infants, idiots, and lunatics returned to the chancery." This principal of parens patriae has been identified as the statutory basis for U.S. governmental intervention in families' child rearing practices.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Jury Finds Nevada County Superior Court Guilty of Retaliation

 Verdict in whistleblower’s historic case exposes the flaws of an unregulated legal system

SACRAMENTO, CA – Former family court mediator Emily Gallup prevailed today in an
historic wrongful termination lawsuit against the Nevada County Superior Court (NCSC). After
three days of deliberation, a Sacramento jury found NCSC guilty of retaliating against Ms.
Gallup, awarding her $313,000 for the financial and emotional damages she incurred. Gallup was represented by M.Catherine Jones and George Allen in the four week trial.
“This verdict should serve as a wakeup call to family courts across America,” said Gallup.
“Children cannot be treated like widgets and shoved through the family court machine. Laws
protecting the best interests of children must be followed.” 
Gallup alleged during the trial that her department failed to comply with the California Rules of
Court. She reported that family court mediators were making recommendations about child
custody without reviewing court files, gathering collateral information, or checking parents’
criminal backgrounds. She explained to jurors that domestic violence (DV) victims were
routinely not offered separate mediation sessions as required by law. Trial witnesses testified that parents were subjected to a variety of coercive tactics by Judge Julie McManus and court
mediators, including threats that their children might commit suicide if they failed to reach a
mediated agreement.
  “Children’s health and safety were being compromised,” Gallup states. “I was being told to do
what I was told, and I just couldn’t do that in good conscience. I wasn’t willing to blindly follow
misguided orders,” Gallup explains, “even if they came from a judge.”
It has been a long road for Gallup toward today’s decision. She originally discussed her
compliance concerns with her supervisor, the family court judge, the human resources director,
and the Court Executive Officer. She called the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) for
help in April of 2010 but learned that the AOC was not authorized to enforce individual court’s
compliance with the law. Gallup filed a grievance against her department at that time, and an
arbitration hearing occurred in September of 2010. NCSC terminated Gallup in December 2010, prior to the issuance of the arbitrator’s award. The arbitrator found in Gallup’s favor, ruling that she had raised concerns in good faith, and that her efforts had been met with retaliation. Inaddition to awarding Gallup back pay and attorney’s fees, the arbitrator ordered an audit of theNevada County Family Court Services Department. NCSC subsequently had the arbitration award vacated on the grounds that the arbitrator overstepped his authority by ordering an audit.
“There is a shocking lack of oversight over the judicial system,” Gallup said.
She has joined forces with the Center for Judicial Excellence and the California Protective
Parents Association to lobby for reforms that will bring accountability to the family court
system. Gallup expects that problems in the family court system will persist until judges and
other court officials are held accountable for following the law.

*The posts made in this blog are of our opinion only* Without Prejudice UCC 1-207

No comments: